data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0078d/0078db4bd7ea5e03c05e9816dbf52d6e901ae51f" alt="Property Tax Appeals"
In a victory for property taxpayers across the nutmeg state, the Connecticut Supreme Court recently held in 7 Germantown Rd., LLC v. City of Danbury, No. 21024, 2025 WL 309848 (Conn. Jan. 28, 2025) (“Germantown”) that a taxpayer’s failure to timely satisfy the appraisal filing requirement pursuant to C.G.S. § 12-117a does not result in the automatic dismissal of its case.
Pursuant to C.G.S. § 12-117a, in Superior Court property tax appeals involving real property assessed at one million dollars or more, a taxpayer “shall file with the court, not later than one hundred twenty days after [commencing the court case] an appraisal of the real property.” Further, “[i]f such appraisal is not timely filed the court may dismiss the [case].” The statute also gives the trial court discretion to extend the 120-day deadline for good cause shown.
The plaintiffs in Germantown produced their appraisal reports to the City of Danbury but failed to file the reports with the court as the law requires.
The City argued that the plaintiffs’ failure to file their reports with the trial court triggered mandatory dismissals of their cases.
The Connecticut Supreme Court disagreed.
Focusing on the statutory mandate that plaintiffs “shall” file an appraisal within 120 days, while permitting that the trial court “may” dismiss a tax appeal for failure to timely file the appraisal, the Germantown Court noted that when a statute uses both “shall” and “may,” it suggests an intent to apply the terms differently—“shall” as mandatory and “may” as discretionary.
Since the Germantown Court found dismissal to be discretionary when a taxpayer fails to timely satisfy the statutory appraisal requirement, it upheld the trial court’s decision not to dismiss the plaintiffs’ cases and remanded the tax appeals back to the trial court to be decided on the merits.
The Germantown decision can be seen as a victory for taxpayers since it reinforces the discretion the legislature placed with the Superior Court to extend the 120-day appraisal deadline and to decide, on a case by case basis, the fate of a tax appeal when that deadline is missed. The decision is also a reminder to taxpayer plaintiffs to strictly adhere to the requirements of the statute and proactively seek extensions of the appraisal filing deadline where needed.
For those interested, a more comprehensive analysis of the Germantown decision can be found here:
Jurisdiction 101: Connecticut Supreme Court Hands Down Win For Taxpayers
Related Practices & Industries
This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.
About Our Property Tax and Valuation Law Blog
Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s Property Tax and Valuation practice with timely information for businesses, nonprofits and individuals in commercial property tax appeals and eminent domain matters.