Share
A trial before the United States Tax Court recently determined the value of a conservation easement imposed on a Georgia golf course which was being contested by the Internal Revenue Service.
Relying on the “before and after” method, which is also used to value eminent domain takings, the Tax Court arrived at a market value of slightly less than $8 million. The lack of an established market for conservation easements required use of this methodology as to which the Court noted both the IRS and the taxpayer seeking recognition of the value of the easement donation agreed.
More interesting than the Court’s detailed parsing of the appraisers’ income and sales methodologies was its characterization of the appraisers and some of the appraisal testimony. For example, one appraiser’s “before and after” values were deemed to be so excessive that they were “not even playable, much less close to the pin”. Another appraiser was deemed not to be “a compelling witness” and had been criticized by the court in other cases. Nevertheless, his work and testimony received more credence by the Court than it otherwise might have because the IRS “did not offer specific criticisms of his valuation other than those discussed by the Court and relied instead on general statements.”
The Tax Court also noted that the IRS neither challenged the comparable sales used by this appraiser nor did it suggest alternatives.
The appraiser whose testimony carried the most water with the Tax Court had taken specialized courses in conservation easement appraisals, appraised over 200 conservation easements in 15 years preceding the trial of this case and had relied on the “before and after” technique in determining the market value of the easement which the Tax Court validated to the tune of about 73%.
Champions Retreat Golf Founders, LLC, Riverwood Land, LLC, Tax Matters Partners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 959 F.3d 1033 (11th Cir. 2020)
Please feel free to contact any members of Pullman's Property Tax and Valuation Practice (Laura Cardillo, Brian McCann, Elliott Pollack, Greg Servodidio or Michael Marafito) with any property tax questions that you may have.
Related Practices & Industries
This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.
About Our Property Tax and Valuation Law Blog
Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s Property Tax and Valuation practice with timely information for businesses, nonprofits and individuals in commercial property tax appeals and eminent domain matters.