Share
Clients often call with questions regarding their need to provide accommodations to pregnant women. In fact, I received such a call last week and was working through a particularly complicated issue when the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued new guidelines yesterday attempting to clarify how employers must accommodate employees with pregnancy-related disabilities. While pregnancy accommodation laws have been around since at least 1978 (at the federal level), the parameters of such protections are not a model of clarity.
Adopting the new guidelines proved to be a controversial matter for the five EEOC Commissioners. They were adopted by a mere 3-2 vote. Two Commissioners opposed issuing any guidelines while the Supreme Court had yet to decide the case of Young v. UPS which is on the Court’s docket. The Court’s decision in Young is not expected until the Court’s next term. Other commissioners felt that confusion regarding proper accommodations of pregnant women under federal law persists to such a degree that a clarification was necessary immediately; it could not be delayed until the Supreme Court decided Young.
One such clarification is that pregnancy-related conditions must be treated the same as disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act -- meaning that a reasonable accommodation must be offered so long as it does not represent an undue hardship for the employer. This what we have been advising our clients for many years, but it is nice to see that the EEOC agrees with us. Additionally, it is now clear that lactation is protected as a medical condition.
The protections under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act are in addition to those provided by Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the ADA, the FMLA, and all corresponding state statutes. In Connecticut, for example, it has long been the rule that pregnant employees are entitled to reasonable leave (unpaid unless an employer specifies otherwise) for a disability relating to a pregnancy or postpartum condition. The new EEOC Guidance can be found here.
The takeaway for employers is that medical conditions relating to pregnancy must be accommodated just as any other disability. Now, more than ever, each situation must be analyzed on a case-by-case basis to avoid discrimination claims.
This blog/web site presents general information only. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice, and you should not consider or rely on it as such. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. This website is not an offer to represent you. You should not act, or refrain from acting, based upon any information at this website. Neither our presentation of such information nor your receipt of it creates nor will create an attorney-client relationship with any reader of this blog. Any links from another site to the blog are beyond the control of Pullman & Comley, LLC and do not convey their approval, support or any relationship to any site or organization. Any description of a result obtained for a client in the past is not intended to be, and is not, a guarantee or promise the firm can or will achieve a similar outcome.
About Our Labor, Employment and Employee Benefits Law Blog
Alerts, commentary, and insights from the attorneys of Pullman & Comley’s Labor, Employment Law and Employee Benefits practice on such workplace topics as labor and employment law, counseling and training, litigation, union issues, as well as employee benefits and ERISA matters.